Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Olmo's avatar

For some reason it was this paragraph that struck me the most:

"That word, psychopath, made him an unrelatable person that was now, apparently, out to cheat her of everything that he could despite nothing, other than that word, had changed."

That sentence alone was enough to illuminate, with cruel clarity, the immense semantic burden the word psychopath carries—and how it has been weaponized against the very people it pretends to describe. It was in that moment that a thought began to grow in me: perhaps what we need, before anything else, is a new word. A word not poisoned by fiction, fear, and moral panic. A word that might allow for neutrality, listening, and dignity. What follows, in good faith, is my small offering in that direction.

A Proposal: “Atremia”

Out of respect for those who live and feel differently—especially for those, like Athena Walker, who have made the brave effort to explain what it truly means to live as a psychopathic person—I would like to offer a neologism: ‘atremia’.

/əˈtriːmiə/

“uh-TREE-mee-uh"

The word psychopath, as it currently circulates through the collective imagination, is so deeply burdened with negative connotations, cinematic distortions, criminalizing diagnoses, and moral prejudice that it may no longer be salvageable. This is not merely a terminological substitution, but a symbolic gesture: an invitation to think from another place.

Atremia (n.)

A neuropsychological disposition characterized by an atypical—or minimally vulnerable—experience of emotions, especially those related to fear, guilt, and affective empathy. Atremia does not imply pathology or deficiency, but rather a different cognitive-affective architecture, one that processes social and moral stimuli with a kind of resonance much less permeated by emotional stress or pain.

From Ancient Greek a- (ἀ-, “without”) + thrēma (θρῆμα, “wound, opening, fissure”).

Literally: “without wound” or “without opening” — suggesting a psychic structure that remains intact, not pierced or exposed by the emotions that usually “open” or “tear” the empathic subject.

“She wasn’t cruel, nor was she indifferent. She was simply atremic. The suffering of others made sense to her, but it didn’t cut through her psychic flesh.”

I propose atremia as an alternative that allows us to speak about this condition with greater neutrality—without dragging along the shadow of centuries of misunderstanding and sensationalism. Above all, it is an act of listening and respect: for those who do not see themselves reflected in the emotional mold of the neurotypical majority, and for those—like Athena—who articulate, with rare precision and elegance, an alternative mode of inhabiting the world. I know such a change is difficult. As long as the entertainment industry keeps selling the myth of the “psychopath” as a serial villain, and as long as parts of psychiatry avoid deep self-reflection, it will be nearly impossible to displace that word. But still, I leave this small seed here, with the hope that—if not this one—perhaps another, fairer word may someday take root in the collective psyche.

Expand full comment
TS6157's avatar

I think there’s a difference between knowing you are a psychopath then meeting a romantic partner and not telling them, and discovering that you are a psychopath when you are already with a romantic partner.

To me, the first equates to a lie by omission. I would therefore view the relationship as being built on a lie. I would feel conned.

In the scenario where the diagnosis is made during the relationship, that’s very different. There is no lie, there would be no sense of having been conned. The person standing before me with the diagnosis is the same person that stood before me the day before. I would see it as a diagnosis that we would explore together. Yes the lack of emotional empathy would bother me most but I would have context, I would already have evidence that I was valued, I would just have to come to terms with the idea that ‘value’ is the psychopathic experience of love.

I feel for the guy whose wife left him in your article. I see the response of the wife as unfair.

In many ways I view the effort that you make for your SO very romantic Athena. It requires a sustained effort to consider your partner’s needs. People probably focus on the mask but it’s more than that, it’s having to remind yourself daily that he is there and he has needs too. It isn’t just a case of remembering to smile when he gets in from work. It’s only when I try to screen out my emotional empathy that I get part way to understanding what you have to add in on a daily basis. You can partially remove the mask around your SO, you get close to just being you, but the consideration, that has to stay. That effort has to be made consistently.

Given that my view is that an aware psychopath should be upfront when entering in to a romantic relationship, that does pose a significant problem for the psychopath. When do you communicate that information? Very difficult given the enduring stigma thanks to persistent misrepresentation. Therein lies the problem in my view. It isn’t actually the diagnosis itself that causes the greatest issue, it’s the misrepresentation of the diagnosis.

Expand full comment
47 more comments...

No posts